MacKenzie Scott Snubbed from Top Donors List Despite $7 Billion

MacKenzie Scott, the ex-wife of **Jeff Bezos**, has donated over **$7 billion** to more than **120 organizations** in 2025, but was not recognized on the Chronicle of Philanthropy's list of top 50 donors due to her secretive approach to philanthropy. Her donations in 2025 alone surpassed **Jeff Bezos**' lifetime giving, with her total donations since 2020 reaching **$26 billion**. Scott's philanthropic organization, **Yield Giving**, does not provide information about her donations, making it difficult for the Chronicle to confirm her gifts. Despite this, Scott has appeared on other generous donor lists, including **Forbes**, which recognized her for the speed and amount of her donations. This story highlights the tension between **philanthropy** and **transparency**, with some arguing that donors should be recognized for their contributions, while others believe that secrecy is necessary to avoid drawing attention away from the causes being supported. For more information on **MacKenzie Scott** and her philanthropic efforts, see [[mackenzie-scott|Mackenzie Scott]]. To learn more about the **Chronicle of Philanthropy** and their list of top donors, visit [[chronicle-of-philanthropy|Chronicle of Philanthropy]].

• **MacKenzie Scott** donated over **$7 billion** to more than **120 organizations** in 2025
• **MacKenzie Scott**'s total donations since 2020 have reached **$26 billion**
• **Jeff Bezos**' lifetime giving has been surpassed by **MacKenzie Scott**'s donations in 2025
• The exclusion of **MacKenzie Scott** from the Chronicle of Philanthropy's list of top 50 donors highlights the tension between **philanthropy** and **transparency**
• Greater transparency and accountability are necessary to promote effective use of philanthropic funds and ensure that donations are making a positive impact

The Chronicle of Philanthropy's decision not to include **MacKenzie Scott** on their list of top 50 donors is a reminder that **philanthropy** is a complex and multifaceted field. While some donors, like Scott, prefer to keep their giving private, others may seek to publicize their donations to raise awareness about important causes. Ultimately, the most important thing is that the donations are making a positive impact, regardless of whether they are publicly recognized or not. For more information on the **Chronicle of Philanthropy** and their criteria for selecting top donors, see [[chronicle-of-philanthropy|Chronicle of Philanthropy]].

The exclusion of **MacKenzie Scott** from the Chronicle of Philanthropy's list of top 50 donors highlights the need for greater transparency in **philanthropy**. By recognizing donors who are willing to be open about their giving, we can encourage more people to follow their example and support important causes. This, in turn, can lead to greater accountability and more effective use of philanthropic funds. For example, **Forbes** has recognized **MacKenzie Scott** for her generous donations, which has helped to raise awareness about the importance of **philanthropy**. To learn more about the impact of **transparency in philanthropy**, see [[transparency-in-philanthropy|Transparency in Philanthropy]].

The exclusion of **MacKenzie Scott** from the Chronicle of Philanthropy's list of top 50 donors is a symptom of a larger problem in **philanthropy**. The lack of transparency and accountability in the field can make it difficult to ensure that donations are being used effectively, and can also perpetuate inequality and unfairness. By not recognizing donors like Scott, who are willing to give generously but prefer to do so privately, we may be missing out on opportunities to support important causes and promote positive change. For more information on the **challenges facing philanthropy**, see [[challenges-in-philanthropy|Challenges in Philanthropy]].

Originally reported by Fortune